logo
Welcome to Foothills Financial Planning, Inc.

  • 529 Plans
  • Banking
  • College Savings
  • Credit
  • Debt
  • Emergency Fund
  • Estate Planning
  • Fiduciary Standard
  • Financial Advisor Compensation
  • General
  • General Personal Finance
  • Gift Tax
  • Health Savings Accounts
  • IRA
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement Planning
  • Spending
  • Stocks
  • Taxes
  • 2010
    • March (3)
    • February (4)
    • January (3)
  • 2009
    • December (1)
    • November (4)
    • October (2)
    • September (6)
    • August (2)
    • July (2)
    • June (2)
    • May (3)
    • April (3)
    • March (5)
    • February (4)
    • January (1)
  • 2008
    • December (2)
    • November (1)
    • September (1)
  • 2007
    • September (1)
    • February (2)
  • 2006
    • November (1)
    • September (1)
    • August (1)
    • January (1)
  • 2005
    • December (2)

Berkshire Hathaway and Residential Real Estate

Monday, March 01, 2010

On Saturday Warren Buffett released the Berkshire Hathaway annual report for 2009, accompanied by his customary shareholder letter.  It won’t hit mailboxes in printed form for a little while, but undoubtedly many people will read it online long before it gets to them.  I thought I’d dedicate a post or two to sharing what I see are some key points emanating from the brain of Buffett via his shareholder letter.  I’ve always felt this was an entertaining and informative read, and this year has not been a disappointment.  You might wonder why you should care what Warren Buffett thinks.  Like anybody else, he has made some good calls and has been off base about some things.  (I should point out that when he's wrong it's usually a matter of timing, and it happens much more infrequently than when he's right).  Regardless, through the companies he owns and the people he knows, he has an almost unequaled perspective on the American economy.  He also has a very rational view of the world, unencumbered by politics, and to a large degree, personal political ideology.  The engine of Berkshire is the insurance business.  They own banks and other financial services companies, as well as having major exposure to residential real estate.  The roots are based in basic, industrial companies.  In other words, Berkshire is directly exposed to pretty much all of the areas of the economy that have caused great concern over the past couple of years.  Although Buffett may be hands-off to a large degree in the operations of most of his businesses, he knows precisely what is going on in all of them.  The last obvious point in favor of lending credence to his views is simply that his investing performance has been unparalleled.  

One thing about the letter that is clear right off the bat is the fact that he felt the need to restate the basic tenets of owning Berkshire Hathaway.  The Berkshire Owner’s Manual is posted online on an ongoing basis.  Recently, however, Berkshire’s B shares have split 50 for 1 to facilitate the purchase of Burlington Northern, and there has been a huge influx of new shareholders.  For that reason, Buffett seems to give more attention than in most years to reiterating the overall philosophy of Berkshire Hathaway.   While it’s true that he reinforces basic concepts every year – and really every chance he gets -  this remains valuable information whether you’ve owned shares for several decades, or you are merely interested in learning from a great investor.

Perhaps the most universally interesting topic Buffett addressed was the state of residential real estate.  He may not typically be associated with this industry.  However, as he points out in the letter, Berkshire-owned MidAmerican Energy in turn owns HomeServices of America.  HomeServcies owns a broad collection of regional realty firms that combined make them the second largest real estate brokerage firm in the US.  Additionally, their website specifies that they are the “largest brokerage-owned settlement services (mortgage, title, escrow and insurance) provider in the United States.”  Berkshire also owns Clayton Homes, which has become the largest maker of modular and manufactured homes in the US.  This is all a long-winded way of saying that Buffett has a pretty good vantage point from which to view the problems and opportunities facing residential real estate.

First, some numbers.  Total industry output of manufactured homes has dropped from 382,000 in 1999 to 60,000 in 2009.  That has led to the bankruptcy of 1999’s top three manufacturers.  More generally, housing starts in the US have dropped to a fifty year low, at 554,000. (For some context on the trend of housing starts, see the chart at the bottom of this post.)

At last year’s annual meeting, Buffett talked at some length about the supply and demand dynamics in real estate, and how prices will start to pick up again when we work off the excess inventory that existed then in the system.  Typical, rational view of things, and of course he had the numbers at the tip of his tongue. 

The big news coming out of this discussion?  Warren Buffett believes that within the next “year or so” our housing problems should be largely behind us.  Of course, housing is overwhelmingly a local phenomenon, and there will be regions that continue to feel the effects of overbuilding well beyond 2011.  Furthermore, the upper end of the spectrum in many areas may still be years away from real recovery.  For instance, I recently saw data for the Phoenix area that indicated that inventory for homes under $400,000 was actually approaching neutral, meaning that it didn’t particularly favor buyers or sellers.  However, above $3m (I think…may have been $2m) there was enough inventory to serve buyers for over five years!  Note:  don’t hang your hat on these numbers as they are approximate and a couple of months old.  The point remains, though.

We may still be in for some bumps, but I suspect it’s comforting for most people to hear one of the most rational players in American business state that there’s light at the end of the tunnel.


Housing Start Data, courtesy of the US Census Bureau

 

Tags: berkshire hathaway, warren buffett, real estate recovery

Real Estate

E-mail | del.icio.us

First-Time Homebuyer Credit Extension

Monday, November 09, 2009

Last Friday saw the signing into law of the much-anticipated extension to the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit, called The Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009.

I’ll summarize the other areas in a separate post.

On the First-Time Homebuyer front, this bill extends the original First-Time Homebuyer Credit  through April 30, 2010.  The original legislation for 2009 required that homes be purchased by November 30 of this year.  Furthermore, current homeowners who’ve owned their homes for more than five years may now be eligible for up to $6,500 if they opt to buy a new home.  Originally, the full credit was unavailable for individuals earning more than $75,000 and couples earning more than $150,000.  Those limits have been increased to $125,000 and $225,000.  The credit phases out as incomes approach $145,000 and $245,000.

Note that the new provisions are in effect for homes purchased between November 7, 2009 and April 30, 2010.  As long as a binding contract is in place by April 30, buyers will have until July 1 to close.

Homes that cost more than $800,000 are not eligible for the credit.  Given the income limitations, this is not likely to be a common problem.

Tags:

Real Estate | Taxes

E-mail | del.icio.us

Loans for the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit

Friday, May 29, 2009
The Federal Housing Administration today released a plan by which first-time homebuyers can take advantage of the previously announced $8,000 tax credit by obtaining a short-term loan to apply the money to their down payment or closing costs.  As I understand it, homebuyers will still have to produce a 3.5% down payment, prior to applying tax credit dollars.  In other words, the $8,000 can be used as down payment funds above the initial 3.5%, which could allow buyers to secure better interest rates.

The tax credit will be taken against the amount owed with taxpayers’ 2009 tax filing.  However, the new program allows taxpayers to get a loan to access the $8,000 in 2009, prior to completing their tax returns.

For more information, see the HUD press release:  http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr09-072.cfm.

Tags: first-time homebuyer, tax credit

Real Estate | Taxes

E-mail | del.icio.us

Zillow Shows Prices Increases

Saturday, May 09, 2009

I’ve used zillow.com for several years to maintain a general feel for the direction of real estate prices.  There have definitely been times where I’ve questioned its veracity, but for the most part it seems to provide a reasonable approximation of market values.  It’s been helpful at times in my business and it fulfills my curiosity about pricing in different areas of the country.

At some point, without knowingly requesting it, I started receiving “Zillow Home Report” emails for two houses that my wife and I own.  These messages were not especially welcome because - almost without exception - they’ve merely served as a reminder that home values were decreasing in the neighborhoods where the houses are located.  Of course, this has been true just about everywhere, and I didn’t opt out of the emails because they are not too frequent, and I really would like to know if values take a truly dramatic dive.  Note that in my definition of “dramatic”, that has not actually happened yet.

Today I checked my Inbox and there were two Home Reports from Friday.  They brought news that I’ve now forgotten ever seeing:  in Zillow’s estimation, both homes that we’re tracking increased in value!  For several reasons, this information is essentially meaningless.  Most importantly, I do not intend to sell either home any time soon.  Also, Zillow can do little more than aggregate data from various sources, and the service has no insight into how upgraded our houses are relative to others, etc.  Nonetheless, the information is another in a small collection of feeble indicators that support what I’ve firmly believed for awhile now - better days are ahead.

Tags: zillow

Real Estate

E-mail | del.icio.us

Overview of the First-Time Homebuyer Credit

Thursday, March 19, 2009

In a previous post, I ruminated about what type of person was in a good position to take advantage of some of the financial incentives the government was offering. Things have changed a lot since then, and some of those incentives have evolved. The homebuyer credit I referenced at that time did not change, but it was enhanced for purchasers of homes in 2009. For instance, buyers in 2009 will be eligible for an $8,000 tax credit, up from $7,500 in 2008. Of bigger import, while the 2008 credit was essentially a loan that had to be paid off over 15 years, taxpayers who qualify for the 2009 credit will not have to pay off the loan unless they sell the house within three years of purchasing it.

Quick review: a tax credit is a dollar for dollar reduction in taxes owed. So if you complete your return and find that you’ve paid the IRS $6000 throughout the year through withholding, and now owe an additional $3000, a credit of $8000 would entitle you to a refund of $5000. In other words:

Owe

$9000

Less

$8000 credit

Net owed

$1000

Paid

$6000

Refund

$5000

 

Restrictions

  • The credit will not exceed 10% of the purchase price of the home; it is up to $7,500/$8,000 based on whether or not the purchase price exceeds $75,000/$80,000.
  • The primary home must be in the US.
  • The primary home must have been purchased by the taxpayer, i.e. it cannot have been inherited or gifted to them.
  • The primary home cannot have been purchased from a “related” person – husband/wife, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild.
  • The taxpayer must be a US citizen or a resident alien with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number.
  • The purchase date of house must be between April 8, 2008 and November 30, 2009.
  • The taxpayer cannot have owned a primary residence for three years prior to the date of purchase, although owning a home prior to the three year period does not disqualify him or her.
  • Income limits: full credit is available for single taxpayers with a modified adjust gross income (MAGI) up to $75,000 and married couples filing jointly with a MAGI up to $150,000. The credit phases out for taxpayers making more than that and is wholly unavailable for single filers making more than $95,000, and married filing jointly filers making more than $170,000.

Mechanics

  • If the home is purchased in 2009, the credit can be claimed on either the 2008 return (or amended return) or the 2009 return. This is a nice feature that allows for some strategizing.
  • Use Form 5405 to claim the credit.
  • Repayment for 2008 “credits” will be repaid in 15 equal installments on an annual basis.
  • Payments begin in 2010.
  • If the taxpayer dies, the remaining balance is forgiven, although a surviving spouse would have to continue paying ½ of the balance due.
  • If the home is sold or otherwise ceases to be the primary residence within the 15 year repayment period, the balance becomes due.

Summary of differences between 2008 and 2009

 


2008

2009

Maximum credit

$7500 for married filing jointly

 

$8000 for married filing jointly

Payback period

15 years

N/A if house remains primary home for 3 years following purchase

Income limit for full credit

$75,000 for individual taxpayers; $150,000 for married filing jointly

$75,000 for individual taxpayers; $150,000 for married filing jointly

 


 


 


 

For additional information, see the First-Time Homebuyer Credit Information Center on the IRS web site.

Tags: first-time homebuyer, tax credit

Real Estate | Taxes

E-mail | del.icio.us

Who Can Benefit Most from the Current Environment?

Sunday, December 21, 2008

As I pointed out in a parallel post, I recently drove from Chicago to Phoenix and had ample time to listen to podcasts and catch up with a range of financial and business news, among other things.  While listening to one of the several Wall Street Journal podcasts, I was startled to hear the narrator state that even Warren Buffett had been wrong about his recent call on the stock market.  If you didn’t catch the reference, it was a response to Buffett’s op-ed in the New York Times on October 16, in which he said that he is betting on American equities.  I suppose the point of the podcast was that the markets have been very volatile and unpredictable over the last few months.  Quite an insight.  What’s shocking to me is that Warren Buffett is undoubtedly the most scrutinized investor in history.  That is not hyperbole.  There have been other investors that have outperformed the market on a sustained basis, and I’m not even suggesting that Buffett is the most successful investor of all time.  That’s impossible to determine.  However, we’ve never had the multitude of channels of information that we now have.  Despite the irony of it, given his lifestyle, he is indeed a celebrity investor in a time of massive media access.  The point of all this is that most people who spend any time paying attention to the Buffett investing philosophy know that he wasn’t calling an absolute market low in October.  He was simply acting on the belief that the market as a whole was undervalued, and he was acting greedy in a time when others were acting out of fear.  Could it become more undervalued?  Maybe.  Could it gain 20% the day after he decided to jump in?  Perhaps.  Which, incidentally, would mean that he would have missed that upside had he not been in the market, which is the whole point of his article.

Before I continue, let me point out that one doesn’t have to be a Buffett observer to understand his perspective when he chose to buy into the US stock market.  His rationale wasn’t shrouded in Greenspan-like rhetoric.  To quote from the article:  “Let me be clear on one point: I can’t predict the short-term movements of the stock market. I haven’t the faintest idea as to whether stocks will be higher or lower a month — or a year — from now. What is likely, however, is that the market will move higher, perhaps substantially so, well before either sentiment or the economy turns up. So if you wait for the robins, spring will be over.”

So why is this aggravating to me?  I guess the real answer to that is that the media is perpetuating a sentiment of fear that feeds a cycle that can be dangerous to all of us.  From a more applied perspective, though, I think it causes people to act in a way that runs counter to what is in their best interest.  Without doubt, times are tough.  The question is, what are you going to do about it?  That brings us to the point of this post.  The discussion on the podcast set me to thinking about who is in a position to benefit from the current economic and psychological environment.  I’m not referring to what companies or industries do well in a down market, or which hedge funds are poised to reap the benefits of the fear that has swept substantially all of our markets.  I’m thinking more about individuals.  Many of us had a significant percentage of our assets in the stock market heading into this mess.  There are things we can do, especially at year-end, to harvest tax losses and such (see your financial advisor for help with this), but unless we’ve been sitting on cash for the last year or so, our net worth has decreased, probably by a lot.  In Warren Buffett’s case, the pile of money to which he was referring was in his own account, which is typically invested in government bonds.  In other words, he was sitting on a pile of money that was not ravaged by the recent stock market decline.  That’s nice for Warren Buffett and his heirs, but who else is in a position to take advantage of this situation?
Retirees are certainly the class that has been the hardest hit by this.  They have little opportunity to recover from an investment standpoint, and in many cases can do nothing to enhance their income at this point.  As retirement tends to last a lot longer than it used to, many retirees have had some exposure to the stock market, so they’ve felt some pain.

People nearing retirement are in a position that is similar to retirees, except that they may have a better chance to recover because their time horizon may be a bit longer, and they generally will have the option of working longer than they had planned.  Not a great scenario, but it’s good to have options.
Those of us who are in the accumulation period of our lives are better poised to benefit from the current scenario.  In general, we may have been hit hard by the declines in our 401ks and the 529 plans we’ve set up for our children’s education, but we’re also typically investing on a consistent basis, which means we’re taking advantage of some fantastic bargains at present.  I know it doesn’t feel very good right now, but people really do build wealth in times like these.  The worst thing we can do is put our money in cash equivalents or over-allocate to fixed income.  I will say that there are a lot of opportunities in bonds right now as well as stocks, however, and you should discuss that tradeoff with a financial advisor.

This brings me to group of individuals who I think are in the best position to establish a firm financial foundation for the future in this environment.  I’m going to be specific, but pieces of this are relevant those who share some attributes with the profile I’m specifying.  Young, dual income couples who are professionals and have not owned a house are in the sweet spot to benefit from this crisis.  The housing market is down, and the government really wants you to purchase a home.  That is not a new concept; there are powerful tax incentives for all homeowners.  But if you’re willing to buy before July 1, 2009, the federal government wants to give you an interest-free loan of $7500.  More on that later.  In addition, you’ll have two incomes to pay your bills, and you likely both have some sort of defined contribution retirement plan to which you can contribute, i.e. a 401k.  Here’s the thing:  as much as I’d appreciate you doing your part for the economy and buying that $50k BMW because you just got a big raise, don’t do it.  Get a used Toyota and invest your money.  It will probably be a while until we see a better time to invest, and how much happier will you really be with an expensive car?  Likewise the home electronics, etc.  Think hard about the personal utility you’re going to realize from the expenditures you make.  I’m not suggesting that your only concern should be building wealth, but I do believe that you have a unique window of opportunity to maximize your investments and establish a framework that can lead to financial freedom in your future.  There are some tremendous bargains in the stock market right now.  Ignore the news and invest aggressively with money you don’t need in the short term.

As for housing, in most parts of the country there are many opportunities for patient investors.  Unfortunately, some of these prizes come in the form of bank-owned properties that are the result of somebody else’s misfortune.  Regardless, the government wants to give you an additional $7500 on top of a mortgage deduction to stop paying rent and start building equity.  I say…do it.  You don’t have to buy your dream house at 25 years old.  If you’re savvy, you can buy a relatively inexpensive home to live in for a few years, and it can then become an investment property when you move on to something else.  I realize that $7500 is not a ton of money relative to home prices, but it’s a boost, and it goes a lot farther today than it did 2-3 years ago.  With that said, let’s talk a bit about the high-level parameters of this tax credit.

  • It’s only available for first-time homebuyers, or those who have not owned anything for at least three years.
  • The home must be, or have been, purchased between April 9, 2008 and July 1, 2009.
  • If you’re single, your income must be below $75k for the full credit.  If you’re married, combined income must fall below $150k.
  • This is essentially a loan.  You must pay it back, interest-free, over a 15 year period.

Of course, you shouldn’t over-extend yourself to purchase a home.  Keep your payments within 28% of your gross income.  Again, that should be much less problematic than it was a couple of years ago.

As I indicated earlier, if you share any attributes with the profile I’ve described, you’re a candidate to benefit now from this crisis.  Without question, there is a lot of fear impacting the economy right now, and it’s certainly not totally unfounded.  It is, however, very influential in terms of our overall economic health.  If people are too afraid to buy, companies don’t realize revenue, they have to lay off workers, unemployment rises, and things just get worse.  Today, the risks we face in most markets (i.e. the stock market, the housing market, the bond market) are significantly lower than they were a couple of years ago, when prices were astronomical relative to the intrinsic value of these assets.  That’s a simple concept, but very hard for most people to internalize.  If you can do that, you stand to build a strong financial foundation for your future.

Tags:

General Personal Finance | Real Estate | Retirement Planning

E-mail | del.icio.us

PMI Deductibility

Friday, February 09, 2007

At the start of 2006, I talked about some important new limits for tax deductions and retirement planning purposes. That was useful information for planning purposes, but may once again be helpful, now that we’re in the middle of the tax prep season for the 2006 tax year.

I wanted to hit on one additional item: there has been a fair bit of media discussion regarding the deductibility of Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) premiums, but there is very little “official” documentation of this development. The deduction stems from the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, which was passed by Congress and signed by the President late last year. For key provisions of that act, see the White House fact sheet. In any case, the reality for PMI deductibility seems to be that a) right now it is only in effect for 2007, and b) it only applies to loans originating in 2007. In other words, existing mortgages that are subject to PMI do not qualify. The fact that it it is set to expire for 2008 is probably less of a concern, as these laws are often renewed. For the sake of PMI payers, let’s hope that this does get renewed, and in the process that renewal includes existing PMI policies.

Tags:

Real Estate

E-mail | del.icio.us

Real Estate Capital Gains Tax Break

Saturday, February 03, 2007
My parents recently sold their home, and the tax implications of that sale came up as I was preparing their taxes, so I thought I’d issue a reminder of the current tax law with regard to the sale of your primary residence. It is pretty straightforward: taxpayers filing singly are entitled to $250,000 in profit without paying any tax, and married filers are entitled to $500,000 in profits tax-free. There is no longer any requirement to roll gains into a more expensive home, either. Again, this only pertains to the sale of a primary residence…rental homes don’t apply. That generally means that one would have had to live in the home for two of the previous five years to qualify, even if those two years were not consecutive.

Tags:

Real Estate | Taxes

E-mail | del.icio.us

Real Estate Classifieds

Monday, August 28, 2006

Yesterday I spent some time reading the Real Estate section of the Chicago Tribune. I did this a lot when I was younger, in high school and college, as an educational process. I used to pay a lot of attention to the small picture ads and even the classified listings to try to get a feel for values in various sectors of the metro area. Does anybody do that anymore? Read the listings, I mean. It hit me yesterday that the section looks pretty much the same as it did twenty years ago, even though the Trib has a pretty stout internet presence. Haven’t sites like realtor.com, not to mention the Tribune’s own real estate search capability, rendered the printed listings obsolete?

Just seemed kinda odd to me.

Tags:

Real Estate

E-mail | del.icio.us
 

HOME | SERVICES | ABOUT US | FAQ | CLIENT FORMS | NEWS | DISCLOSURES | BLOG © 2008 FOOTHILLS FINANCIAL PLANNING, INC WEBSITE DESIGN AND PRODUCTION BY GLENDALE DESIGNS